Connect with us


The Subpoena Can Shed Light on How the January 6th Rally Gathered.



How much could the former president reveal to the House Committee investigating the parliamentary riots with a violent subpoena on January 6? Donald Trump With his campaign White House He was involved in planning a rally prior to the riot — was billed as a grassroots demonstration.

Eleven subpoenas sent this week were sent to those who organized and worked in Ellipse rallies. There, Trump urged the crowd to march to the Capitol, saying, “Weaknesses will never regain our country.” You have to show power, and you have to be strong. “

Most of the organizers worked in Trump’s presidential campaign or his administration and were able to provide new details on how the rally that launched the violent attack came together.

The Commission’s request includes planning, funding, attendance-related materials for events at Ellipse organized to protest the outcome of the November elections, and events leading up to events such as bus tours and marches. Was included. Washington in November and December. The commission also said it called for communication with Trump administration officials and lawmakers. This can indicate whether government officials were involved in the day’s plans and how deeply they were involved.

People with subpoenas hired by the company to provide security for the event of the day said they would cooperate with the Associated Press.

Lyndon Brentnall, a Florida-based RMS protection service operator, said: “As far as we are concerned, we have implemented security at legally permitted events conducted in collaboration with the US Secret Service and the Park Police Department.”

It was not clear whether others would submit the document by October 13, as requested by the Commission, or to testify at the testimony record scheduled for late October to early November. The AP sent and sent emails and text messages to online accounts, called the phone list of all summoned people, but only Brentnal provided comments.

According to Brentnal, the staff who worked as security guards with him at the event were scrutinized by the Secret Service and park police. He said their name, phone number and social security number were submitted in advance.

“We literally performed event security, VIP transportation from hotel to event, and event to hotel transportation. That’s literally all we did,” he told AP.

The two, familiar with event planning, told AP that the White House coordinated with the event organizers after Trump noticed the rally plan in mid-December. They were not allowed to discuss the issue publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.

Almost all the summoned people were listed on the event permit issued to Women for America First, a pro-trump group with roots in the Tea Party movement. Three people who were currently or previously involved in the group have been summoned. Amy Kremer Her daughters, Kylie Jane Klemer and Cindy Chafian.

Chafian was licensed for Women for America First at a December 12 rally at Freedom Plaza, which attracted Trump’s attention. Trump cheered from the crowd below as President’s helicopter Marine One passed a rally on his way to a football game in New York’s Army and Navy.

Within days, several groups under the umbrella of “Stop the Steal” began planning their next move, according to Kimberly Fletcher, founder of Moms for America. This time around, it’s related to the January 6th vote approval in Congress. Of the coalition. Fletcher told AP in January that the group started planning around mid-December. Trump immediately received the wind of the plan.

“A massive protest in Washington, DC on January 6th,” Trump tweeted to millions of followers on December 19th.

“When the president said,’Come to DC,’ it was … just oops!” Fletcher recalled to AP in January. AP reported at the time that many of the people listed in the staff position on the January 6 rally permit were either participating in the Trump campaign salary or had close ties to the White House. Seven of the summoned people worked in the Trump campaign, and at least three previously worked in the Trump administration.

Trump’s growing interest at the January 6 event has been closely linked to presidential campaigns such as Trump’s reelection campaign and Caroline Ren, a national finance consultant for Trump Victory, a joint funding organization run by RNC. People were involved. Ren is one of the people summoned by the committee.

She and her Texas-based consulting firm, Bluebonnet Fundraising, received $ 892,000 from the Trump presidential campaign, the Republican National Committee, and Trump’s victory between April 2017 and November 2020. Federal Election Commission record.

The former president wasn’t on the original rally schedule, but shortly after New Year’s Day, it was revealed that he would attend directly, recalling those involved in the event on January 5th and 6th, including Mr. Fletcher.

According to a controversial individual, Trump is almost certain to be the main speaker, and sharing the stage with him has sparked intense debate between the rally organizers and those near the White House. rice field. They were not allowed to discuss the issue publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.

Katrina Pearson, a longtime Trump ally and presidential adviser, was acquired to coordinate with the White House and organize a list of speakers who share the stage with Trump. The former president wanted a small group of members of parliament, his family, and officials from Women for America First. Pearson was near Clemmers, who was fighting Ren over control of the event.

Pearson is one of two people summoned this week not listed in the final permit issued on January 5. The other was Chafian. According to FEC records, the Trump campaign paid Pearson $ 10,000 every two weeks from September 2019 to December 2020.

Others summoned included Maggie Mulvaney, the niece of former Top Trump aide Mick Mulvaney. She was listed as a “VIP lead” in the permit attachment. Mulvaney was the Chief Financial Officer of the 2020 Trump Campaign and received $ 5,000 every two weeks until mid-November. Her LinkedIn profile describes her as a foreign affairs manager for the Trump campaign.

According to the staff directory on the legislator’s website, Maggie Malbunny is currently working as a senior adviser to Republican Rep. Carol Miller. AP called Mulvaney’s parliamentary office and sent an email to her personal and parliamentary email addresses, but she did not reply.

Mulvaney is one of at least two rally organizers who got a job in the US House of Representatives within a few weeks of a deadly attack that plundered Congressional halls and offices. Another Kiran Menon was listed as an Operations Associate at the January 6 rally and was included in the Trump Campaign salary from July to November 2020. Menon is not included in what was summoned by the Commission. According to Parliamentary Directory and LinkedIn, Menon secured his position with Ohio Republican Jim Jordan in February.

Menon forwarded a request for comment to Jordanian spokesman Russell Dye. Russell Dye called him “a talented and dedicated staff who was not involved in the events at the Capitol” and “a young conservative of excellence.” Dye said in a statement that it was irresponsible and dangerous for AP to print Menon’s name.

Also this week, Hannah Salem Stone and Megan Powers were summoned. Both belonged to the Trump administration and worked at various points in the Trump campaign. Stone was Larry’s “Logistics and Communications Operations Manager” listed under the name “Hanna Salem.” She said in a recent podcast on event security that she was the President’s Special Aide and Director of Press Advance at the White House under Trump and left in February 2020. The FEC record is a Trump campaign for 2020 by her and her company, Salem Strategy.

Powers first started working in the Trump campaign before Trump announced the presidential election in June 2015. She later worked at the White House and NASA. According to his LinkedIn profile, in January 2021, Powers was responsible for running the Trump campaign, and according to FEC records, Powers was paid $ 8,500 every two weeks. She was listed on the permit as the “Operations Manager for Scheduling and Guidance” at the January 6th rally. Election funding records show that in February, months after Trump lost to President Joe Biden in the 2020 elections, the PAC, which makes Trump supporters America great again, powers more than $ 19,000 in executive branching. Paid for.

Two people were also summoned who were involved in the management and production company’s event strategy. The company’s founder and president, Tim Younes, and former First Lady’s top aide, Justin Capolare. Melania Trump

According to FEC records, Caporale, listed on the permit as project manager for the event, was included in the Trump campaign salary for most of 2020 and earned $ 7,500 every two weeks. According to the permit documents, Younes was the “stage manager” of the rally.

Younes has a long-standing relationship with Trump, the connection he emphasizes on his company’s website. According to election funding records, UNES and Event Strategy will be 340 for consulting, audiovisual and event production services from January 2016 to December 2020 from Trump Campaign, Trump Victory, Republican National Committee. Over 10,000 dollars have been paid.


Smith reported from Providence, Rhode Island.

The subpoena can shed light on how the January 6th rally gathered.

Source link The subpoena can shed light on how the January 6th rally gathered.

The post The subpoena can shed light on how the January 6th rally gathered. appeared first on Florida News Times.

Read More


Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


European Court of Human Rights Affirms Freedom of Religion or Belief of Russian Scientologist



LOS ANGELES, Calif., Oct. 6, 2021 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) — The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has once again affirmed the rights of Scientologists in Russia to practice their religion based on Article 9 of the ECHR Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, announced the Church of Scientology International.

PHOTO CAPTION: European Court of Human Rights (Photo by Katrinitsa, Creative Commons license).

Article 9 states:

“Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance.

“Freedom to manifest one’s religion or beliefs shall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.”

In its September 28, 2021, judgment in Kuropyatnik v. Russia, (Application no. 64403/11), the ECHR ruled that Scientologist Vladimir Leonidovich Kuropyatnik, a Moscow Scientologist, was illegally detained by a Russian police officer who questioned him on the basis of his membership in the Scientology religion.

The Court found Kuropyatnik’s October 13, 2010, detention deprived him of liberty and violated Articles 8 and 9 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms which guarantee the right to respect for private and family life and freedom of thought, conscience and religion.

The ECHR noted that at the time this incident took place, the Church of Scientology had been registered as a religious organization in Russia for more than two decades and that Russian authorities had consistently over the years acknowledged the religious nature of Scientology. This Court found Russian police targeting Mr. Kuropyatnik for being a Scientologist was a blatant abuse of his religious freedom by the Russian state and ordered Russia to pay him EUR8,000 in damages for violating his human rights.

This decision is consistent with the European Court of Human Rights landmark decision of 5 April 2007 in the case Church of Scientology Moscow v. Russia (Application no. 18147/02), which overturned the Moscow city government’s refusal to register the Church of Scientology of Moscow as a religious organization. The Court found that Russia violated the rights of the Church of Scientology under ECHR Article 11 (the right to freedom of association) “read in the light of Article 9” (the right to freedom of religion) when it refused to reregister the Church of Scientology of Moscow.

Once again, the European Court of Human Rights has upheld that Scientologists are guaranteed the same rights by the European Convention on Human Rights granted to those of any other religious organization.

The European Court of Human Rights was established to create a mechanism for the resolution of human rights complaints against States parties to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The Convention was adopted by the Council of Europe in 1950. Located in Strasbourg, France, the Court has jurisdiction over 47 states in Europe, including Russia, with a combined population of some 820 million citizens.

This announcement was originally published as a blog on the Scientology Religion website. The Church of Scientology publishes this blog to help create a better understanding of the freedom of religion and belief and provide news on religious freedom and issues affecting this freedom around the world.

The Founder of the Scientology religion is L. Ron Hubbard and Mr. David Miscavige is the religion’s ecclesiastical leader.

For more information on Scientology, visit the Scientology website or the Scientology TV network.

RELATED LINKS{%22appno%22:[%2264403/11%22]}

News Source: Church of Scientology International

European Court of Human Rights Affirms Freedom of Religion or Belief of Russian Scientologist Source link European Court of Human Rights Affirms Freedom of Religion or Belief of Russian Scientologist

The post European Court of Human Rights Affirms Freedom of Religion or Belief of Russian Scientologist appeared first on Florida News Times.

Read More


Continue Reading


Debt Cap Voting: Republicans Are Poised to Thwart Efforts to Raise Borrowing Limits As Defaults Are Approaching



Washington-As the country barrels towards default, Republicans are ready to sink Democratic efforts to suspend federal borrowing restrictions.

Senate Republicans are blocking measures passed in the House of Representatives that will be suspended Debt limit Until December 2022. At least 10 Republicans must join all Senate Democrats to break the GOP filibuster and pass the bill with a simple majority vote.

Democrats argue that this will give Republicans exactly what they are looking for: a country’s borrowing limit approved only by Democrats.

“Tomorrow’s vote is not a vote to raise debt caps, but rather a procedural step to get Democrats to raise debt caps,” Senate leader Chuck Schumer said Tuesday. “We’re not asking the Republicans to vote for you, they’re just letting them vote.”
more: Why Daily Americans Need to Care About Debt Caps

But the Republicans aren’t retreating. They have full control of Washington and plan to pass trillions of socio-economic packages with zero Republican input, so Democrats must act to raise their federal debt caps themselves. I’ve been doing things that don’t happen for months.

“They said they were ready to work on their own,” Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell told reporters Tuesday. “The easiest way to do this is to use the tuning process, as I’ve pointed out for two months.”

Republican McConnell has reiterated that Democrats need to raise debt limits to cover the potential trillions of costs in the unpassed portion of President Joe Biden’s agenda, but it has already taken. Debt limits need to be raised to cover spending under the unified Republican-backed Trump administration.

Senator Lindsey Graham (RS.C.) said she did not support voting on ABC News on Tuesday.

“We are not going to empower a radical march towards socialism,” said Graham, a top Republican member of the Budget Committee.

Senator Bernie Sanders, chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, has highlighted potential solutions, including temporarily suspending filibuster rules that require 60 votes for most bills.

“It could go down, at least for a demand on a debt limit to end the filibuster and pass it with 51 votes,” Sanders suggested.

However, to do this, a rally of 50 Democrats needed to remain unified, and both Senator Joe Manchin and Senator Kyrsten Sinecine of West Virginia opposed the change in filibuster rules.

Republicans haven’t been recorded yet and say they’re ready to join the Democratic Party to pave the way for a final vote on Wednesday’s debt restrictions, but moderate Senator Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said Many have opened the door to potential participation.

“I want to make sure I’m doing everything I can to avoid falling into the default situation, and I don’t want to get close to it,” Marcusski said. “We need to confirm. We just need to confirm.”

The country technically reached its debt cap on August 1, and the Treasury took special steps to pay the country’s invoice. However, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said her division’s efforts would be completely exhausted by October 18, and defaults would be nearly certain.

Pressure is rising alongside party gridlock, and backup plans have not surfaced.

McConnell and his meeting insist on using a swift budgeting tool called reconciliation that allows Democrats to break filibusters and pass certain laws. The use of this mysterious process is tedious and can take weeks, freeing Democrats into a series of potentially politically distressing votes.

However, insisting on using this process could have additional political interests for Republicans. It will leave Democrats a record of raising debt caps by a large amount, but Wednesday’s vote-simply suspending debt caps at a certain amount-is not. It will affect the Republican story that Democrats are out of control spenders.

Senator Mike Rounds (RS.D.) said on Tuesday that he was “very interested in a particular amount.” “They would have to come in front of the Americans and say,’This is the amount we’re going to spend, so we’re going to increase our debt cap by X.’ There. “

Some Democrats say they support the use of a settlement if it means a quick solution to the debt restriction issue. Manchin said the process should be considered, and Connecticut Senator Richard Blumenthal said when asked by reporters whether to consider fast-track budgeting tools, “everything should be on the table. “.

But with each passing day, Democrats are limited in the amount of time they have to quickly track up debt cap increases through a multi-step process, and Democrats have not begun work on the reconciliation process, even behind the scenes. Tell ABC News about it.

“No, not at this time,” Sanders told ABC News.

Some Democrats were more emphasizing.

“The settlement was never at the table,” said Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren. “I don’t have enough time for the settlement to work.”

But on Tuesday, Schumer did not explicitly exclude it.

Schumer repeatedly mentioned Wednesday’s vote as the preferred way to raise debt caps when asked if they would be excluded using the budgeting process.

“Reconciliation is a complex process drawn out. We have shown the best way. We are moving in that direction,” Schumer refused to entertain Plan B.

If a country defaults, the consequences are definitely catastrophic. The White House warned that unprecedented defaults could shock the global economy and cause a recession. The political impact of both parties is unknown.

Copyright (C) 2021 ABCNews Internet Ventures.

Debt Cap Voting: Republicans are poised to thwart efforts to raise borrowing limits as defaults are approaching

Source link Debt Cap Voting: Republicans are poised to thwart efforts to raise borrowing limits as defaults are approaching

The post Debt Cap Voting: Republicans are poised to thwart efforts to raise borrowing limits as defaults are approaching appeared first on Florida News Times.

Read More

Original Post:

Continue Reading


Which Are the Two Options You Have to Choose From If You Want to Bet on the Go?



People use their computers and laptops to bet on sports and play casino games all the time. Thanks to the different online betting websites, accessing your favorite hobby has never been easier. Everyone (assuming you live in a country where i Gaming is legal) can try out several betting websites in a matter of seconds. There are many differences between the brands, but in general, all of them allow you to use different features and promotions.

Even though those things are great, there are some drawbacks that have to be taken into account. The biggest one is related to the fact that you need to have access to a computer in order to bet. Some people don’t consider this to be a problem because their job requires them to sit in front of the computer all the time. However, others don’t have the privilege of using a PC or a laptop while at work. That’s why those people have no other option but to use their mobile devices.

We live in a world where most people around us use a smartphone or a tablet daily. We always carry those devices with us, which makes them the ideal “tool” to allow us to bet on the go. Let’s take a look at the two things that you can do if you want to have fun without the need for a computer.

Downloading and installing a mobile app

The first thing you can do if you want to use your smartphone or tablet is to download and install a mobile app. This process is complicated and it might take some time, depending on your preferred mobile OS. Luckily, punters with Android and iOS can get the BoyleSports app directly from this source by EB and start using the services of one of the most popular online betting platforms. Although you can download and install this app within seconds, there are many potential problems that some users might come across if they want other apps.

The most common issue Android users have to face is the lack of an app inside Google Play. Only a few iGaming sites have apps there, so you will most likely have to download and install an apk file. To do that, you need to open your device’s settings and enable the option to install apps from different sources.

Using a mobile website

The mobile application that you might want to download and install has a lot of advantages. However, unless you get the BoyleSports app for Android and iOS from Efirbet, you may spend a lot of time trying to find a legit apk file. The good news is that there is a solution to your problems – the mobile website.

Online bettors who don’t want to deal with the problems of getting an app can simply use the operator’s mobile website. Every online casino and bookmaker has a mobile version of its desktop site. Some of them try to make exact copies of their original websites, whereas others are more innovative. No matter which kind of mobile website you choose, it will let you bet on sports and play the casino games you want to. Furthermore, you can use the different features and promos.

The post Which are the two options you have to choose from if you want to bet on the go? appeared first on Florida News Times.

Read More

Source Here:

Continue Reading